On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 03:51:03PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> How about:
>
> /*
>* This function patches either an li or a cmpldi instruction with
>* a new immediate value. This relies on the fact that both li
>* (which is actually ori) and cmpldi both take a 16
On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 07:57 +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 03:51:03PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 12:28 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > > From: "khand...@linux.vnet.ibm.com"
> > >
> > > This patch adds some documentation to 'patch_slb_enco
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 03:51:03PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 12:28 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > From: "khand...@linux.vnet.ibm.com"
> >
> > This patch adds some documentation to 'patch_slb_encoding' function
> > explaining about how it clears the existing immed
On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 12:28 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> From: "khand...@linux.vnet.ibm.com"
>
> This patch adds some documentation to 'patch_slb_encoding' function
> explaining about how it clears the existing immediate value in the
> given instruction and inserts a new one there.
>
> diff
