在 2017/2/13 下午5:08, panxinhui 写道:
>
>
> 在 2017/2/7 下午2:46, Eric Dumazet 写道:
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:21 PM, panxinhui wrote:
>>
>>> hi all
>>> I do some netperf tests and get some benchmark results.
>>> I also attach my test script and netperf-result(Excel)
>>>
> HI, all
> I use lo
在 2017/2/7 下午2:46, Eric Dumazet 写道:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:21 PM, panxinhui wrote:
>
>> hi all
>> I do some netperf tests and get some benchmark results.
>> I also attach my test script and netperf-result(Excel)
>>
HI, all
I use loopback interface to run netperf tests,
#tc qd add d
在 2017/2/7 下午2:46, Eric Dumazet 写道:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:21 PM, panxinhui wrote:
hi all
I do some netperf tests and get some benchmark results.
I also attach my test script and netperf-result(Excel)
There are two machine. one runs netserver and the other runs netperf
benchmark.
On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 20:40 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> A typical benchmark would be to use 200 concurrent netperf -t TCP_RR,
> through a single qdisc (protected by a spinlock)
>
> Non ticket/queued spinlocks behave quite bad in this scenario.
>
> I can try this next week if you want.
That woul
Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
> On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 09:05 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> Is anybody working on adding QUEUED spinlocks to powerpc 64bit ?
>>
>> I've seen past attempts with ticket spinlocks
>> ( https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/449381/ and other related links
>>
On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 09:05 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Is anybody working on adding QUEUED spinlocks to powerpc 64bit ?
>
> I've seen past attempts with ticket spinlocks
> ( https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/449381/ and other related links
> )
>
> But it looks ticket spinlocks are
