On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:57:17PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 01:55:45AM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 07:51:49AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 01:33:55AM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> [snip]
>
> It seems to me that a kind of minim
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 01:55:45AM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 07:51:49AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 01:33:55AM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
[snip]
> I do see that Book-E processors will have severe memory footprint
> constraints (in embedded environment) an
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:57:17PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 01:55:45AM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 07:51:49AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 01:33:55AM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> [snip]
> > I do see that Book-E processors will
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:47:38AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 07:51:49AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 01:33:55AM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> > >- The patch is currently implemented only for PPC64 architecture. Other
> > > architectures (especially Book-
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 07:51:49AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 01:33:55AM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> >Hi PPC Dev folks,
> > Please find a patch below that implements the proposed Hardware
> >Breakpoint interfaces for PPC64 architecture.
> >
> >As a brief introduction, the p
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:56:04AM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
> > Hi PPC Dev folks,
> > Please find a patch below that implements the proposed Hardware
> > Breakpoint interfaces for PPC64 architecture.
> >
> > As a brief introduction, the proposed Hardware Breakpoint
> > infrastructure prov
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 07:51:49AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 01:33:55AM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> >- The patch is currently implemented only for PPC64 architecture. Other
> > architectures (especially Book-E implementations are expected to
> > happen in due course).
>
> D
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 01:33:55AM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
>Hi PPC Dev folks,
> Please find a patch below that implements the proposed Hardware
>Breakpoint interfaces for PPC64 architecture.
>
>As a brief introduction, the proposed Hardware Breakpoint
>infrastructure provides generic in-kernel
> > +struct arch_hw_breakpoint {
> > + char*name; /* Contains name of the symbol to set bkpt */
> > + unsigned long address;
> > + u8 type;
> > +};
>
> Can you reorder this to pack the struct better (ie. put the unsigned
> long first).
Oops, this is a char * not j
> Hi PPC Dev folks,
> Please find a patch below that implements the proposed Hardware
> Breakpoint interfaces for PPC64 architecture.
>
> As a brief introduction, the proposed Hardware Breakpoint
> infrastructure provides generic in-kernel interfaces to which users
> from kernel- and user-sp
10 matches
Mail list logo