On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 16:00 +0530, Srinivasa DS wrote:
> Sorry, I got it wrong, But I dont find my patch in your latest
> powerpc
> git tree(git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/benh/powerpc.git).
Hrm... I thought I merged it. I'll check that tomorrow.
Cheers,
Ben.
__
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 14:36 +0530, Srinivasa D S wrote:
On Monday 14 July 2008 02:36:57 pm Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Signed-off-by: Srinivasa DS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Can you send a cleanup patch against powerpc.git instead ?
Resending the patch against power
On Monday 14 July 2008 11:06:47 pm Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Timur Tabi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Srinivasa D S wrote:
> >> +#define task_pt_regs(tsk) (tsk)->thread.regs
> >
> > Shouldn't this be:
> >
> > #define task_pt_regs(tsk) ((tsk)->thread.regs)
> >
> > just to be safe?
>
> Both
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 14:36 +0530, Srinivasa D S wrote:
> On Monday 14 July 2008 02:36:57 pm Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Srinivasa DS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Can you send a cleanup patch against powerpc.git instead ?
> >
>
> Resending the patch against powerpc.git tre
On Monday 14 July 2008 02:36:57 pm Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Srinivasa DS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Can you send a cleanup patch against powerpc.git instead ?
>
Resending the patch against powerpc.git tree.
Signed-off-by: Srinivasa DS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/asm-
Timur Tabi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Srinivasa D S wrote:
>
>> +#define task_pt_regs(tsk) (tsk)->thread.regs
>
> Shouldn't this be:
>
> #define task_pt_regs(tsk) ((tsk)->thread.regs)
>
> just to be safe?
Both -> and . have already highest precedence as postfix operators.
Andrea
Srinivasa D S wrote:
> +#define task_pt_regs(tsk)(tsk)->thread.regs
Shouldn't this be:
#define task_pt_regs(tsk) ((tsk)->thread.regs)
just to be safe?
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 14:01 +0530, Srinivasa D S wrote:
> On Monday 14 July 2008 04:02:41 am Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > > Below attached patch defines this macro for powerpc arch. Please let
> > > me know your comments on this.
> > >
> > > +#define task_pt_regs(tsk)((struct pt_regs *)(tsk)
On Monday 14 July 2008 04:02:41 am Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > Below attached patch defines this macro for powerpc arch. Please let
> > me know your comments on this.
> >
> > +#define task_pt_regs(tsk) ((struct pt_regs *)(tsk)->thread.regs)
>
> The cast is unnecessary since tsk->thread.regs is alr
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 08:32 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Srinivasa D S writes:
>
> > task_pt_regs() macro defines pt_regs for the given task, this macro is
> > currently not defined for powerpc arch. We need this macro for
> > upcoming utrace features.
> > Below attached patch defines th
Srinivasa D S writes:
> task_pt_regs() macro defines pt_regs for the given task, this macro is
> currently not defined for powerpc arch. We need this macro for
> upcoming utrace features.
> Below attached patch defines this macro for powerpc arch. Please let
> me know your comments on thi
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 19:52 +0530, Srinivasa D S wrote:
> Hi
> task_pt_regs() macro defines pt_regs for the given task, this macro is
> currently not defined for powerpc arch. We need this macro for
> upcoming utrace features.
> Below attached patch defines this macro for powerpc arch. Plea
12 matches
Mail list logo
