On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 12:06 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:29:59AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 14:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:10:53PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >> >On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 18:23 +1000, Gavin Shan w
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:29:59AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 14:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:10:53PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> >On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 18:23 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
.../...
>No, sorry, I mean how does the user get info
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 02:49:13PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
.../...
>
>VFIO_EEH_RECOVER?
>
Then it should contain VFIO_EEH_PE_RESET, which is part of the
recovery. I don't expect the recovery to be done with one ioctl
command :-)
I personally prefer to keep VFIO_EEH_PE_CONFIUGRE, which mean
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:49:19AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 14:30 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 23.05.14 13:58, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:52:23AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> >>> Am 23.05.2014 um 05:23 schrieb Alex Williamson
>> >>> :
>>
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 14:30 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 23.05.14 13:58, Gavin Shan wrote:
> > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:52:23AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>
> >>> Am 23.05.2014 um 05:23 schrieb Alex Williamson
> >>> :
> >>>
> On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 15:00 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 14:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> > >There's no notification, the user needs to observe the return value an
> > >poll? Should we be enabling an eventfd to notify the user of the state
> > >change?
> > >
> >
>
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 14:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:10:53PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 18:23 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> >> The patch adds new IOCTL commands for VFIO PCI device to support
> >> EEH functionality for PCI devices, which have be
On 23.05.14 14:51, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 08:52 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 23.05.2014 um 05:23 schrieb Alex Williamson :
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:17:30AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:55:
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 08:52 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> > Am 23.05.2014 um 05:23 schrieb Alex Williamson :
> >
> >> On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> >>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:17:30AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:55:29AM +0200, Alexande
On 23.05.14 14:43, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 01:58:50PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.05.14 13:55, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 11:58:22AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.05.14 09:37, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Alexander G
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 01:58:50PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>On 23.05.14 13:55, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 11:58:22AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>On 23.05.14 09:37, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>Am 23.05.2014 u
On 23.05.14 13:58, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:52:23AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 23.05.2014 um 05:23 schrieb Alex Williamson :
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:17:30AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11
On 23.05.14 13:55, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 11:58:22AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.05.14 09:37, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 23.05.2014 um 06:37 schrieb Gavin Shan :
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:10:53PM -0600, Alex
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:52:23AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
>> Am 23.05.2014 um 05:23 schrieb Alex Williamson :
>>
>>> On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:17:30AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:55:29AM +0200, Alexa
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 11:58:22AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>On 23.05.14 09:37, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 23.05.2014 um 06:37 schrieb Gavin Shan :
>On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:10:53PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>On Th
On 23.05.14 09:37, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 23.05.2014 um 06:37 schrieb Gavin Shan :
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:10:53PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 18:23 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
The patch adds new IOCTL comma
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> Am 23.05.2014 um 06:37 schrieb Gavin Shan :
>>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:10:53PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 18:23 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
The patch adds new IOCTL commands for VFIO PCI device to
> Am 23.05.2014 um 06:37 schrieb Gavin Shan :
>
>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:10:53PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 18:23 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>> The patch adds new IOCTL commands for VFIO PCI device to support
>>> EEH functionality for PCI devices, which have been
> Am 23.05.2014 um 05:23 schrieb Alex Williamson :
>
>> On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:17:30AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:55:29AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.05.14 10:23, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>
>> .../.
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 14:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> >There's no notification, the user needs to observe the return value an
> >poll? Should we be enabling an eventfd to notify the user of the state
> >change?
> >
>
> Yes. The user needs to monitor the return value. we should have one
> notifi
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:10:53PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 18:23 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> The patch adds new IOCTL commands for VFIO PCI device to support
>> EEH functionality for PCI devices, which have been passed through
>> from host to somebody else via VFIO.
>>
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:17:30AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> >On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:55:29AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>On 22.05.14 10:23, Gavin Shan wrote:
>
> .../...
>
> >>>diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/l
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 18:23 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> The patch adds new IOCTL commands for VFIO PCI device to support
> EEH functionality for PCI devices, which have been passed through
> from host to somebody else via VFIO.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan
> ---
> Documentation/vfio.txt
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:17:30AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:55:29AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>On 22.05.14 10:23, Gavin Shan wrote:
.../...
>>>diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>>>index cb9023d..ef55682 100644
>>>--- a/include/uapi/
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:55:29AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>On 22.05.14 10:23, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>The patch adds new IOCTL commands for VFIO PCI device to support
>>EEH functionality for PCI devices, which have been passed through
>>from host to somebody else via VFIO.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: G
On 22.05.14 10:23, Gavin Shan wrote:
The patch adds new IOCTL commands for VFIO PCI device to support
EEH functionality for PCI devices, which have been passed through
from host to somebody else via VFIO.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan
This already looks a *lot* more sane than the previous versio
26 matches
Mail list logo