On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:43:15 + Alessandro Carminati
wrote:
> Some unit tests intentionally trigger warning backtraces by passing bad
> parameters to kernel API functions. Such unit tests typically check the
> return value from such calls, not the existence of the warning backtrace.
I've had
On 3/13/25 16:05, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:31:12 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 06:24:25PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Yeah, as with my prior review, I'm a fan of this. It makes a bunch of my
very noisy tests much easier to deal with.
And for the reco
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 at 19:44, Alessandro Carminati wrote:
>
> Some unit tests intentionally trigger warning backtraces by passing bad
> parameters to kernel API functions. Such unit tests typically check the
> return value from such calls, not the existence of the warning backtrace.
>
> Such inten
On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 16:14:55 -0600 Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 3/13/25 16:05, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:31:12 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 06:24:25PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> Yeah, as with my prior review, I'm a fan of this. It ma
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 11:38:23AM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 06:24:25PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 10:17:49AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 11:43:15AM +, Alessandro Carminati wrote:
> > > > Some unit
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 06:24:25PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 10:17:49AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 11:43:15AM +, Alessandro Carminati wrote:
> > > Some unit tests intentionally trigger warning backtraces by passing bad
> > > paramete
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:31:12 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 06:24:25PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > >
> > > Yeah, as with my prior review, I'm a fan of this. It makes a bunch of my
> > > very noisy tests much easier to deal with.
> >
> > And for the record, we're also a
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 06:24:25PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, as with my prior review, I'm a fan of this. It makes a bunch of my
> > very noisy tests much easier to deal with.
>
> And for the record, we're also affected by this in DRM and would very
> much like to get it merged in
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 10:17:49AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 11:43:15AM +, Alessandro Carminati wrote:
> > Some unit tests intentionally trigger warning backtraces by passing bad
> > parameters to kernel API functions. Such unit tests typically check the
> > return
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 11:43:15AM +, Alessandro Carminati wrote:
> Some unit tests intentionally trigger warning backtraces by passing bad
> parameters to kernel API functions. Such unit tests typically check the
> return value from such calls, not the existence of the warning backtrace.
Than
10 matches
Mail list logo
