Hi,
On 03/05/2016 at 12:05:34 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> On Tuesday 03 May 2016 09:24:18 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > Hi Arnd,
> >
> > I see you didn't copy Greg on that series (that may explain his
> > confusion on the previous patch), do you expect me to take it
> > through the RTC tree? Th
On Tuesday 03 May 2016 09:24:18 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> I see you didn't copy Greg on that series (that may explain his
> confusion on the previous patch), do you expect me to take it
> through the RTC tree? That is fine but I'd like some acks from him.
Yes, that was a mistake. I
Hi Arnd,
I see you didn't copy Greg on that series (that may explain his
confusion on the previous patch), do you expect me to take it
through the RTC tree? That is fine but I'd like some acks from him.
On 28/04/2016 at 00:34:14 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> I ended up stuffing the two patch ser
Hi Arnd,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> I ended up stuffing the two patch series into one, as they are now
>> more dependent on one another. This now thoroughly removes the
>> genrtc driver including the asm/
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I ended up stuffing the two patch series into one, as they are now
> more dependent on one another. This now thoroughly removes the
> genrtc driver including the asm/rtc.h headers it uses. For all
> architectures that still have a meaningful
