Re: [PATCH v2 92/92] fs: rename i_ctime field to __i_ctime

2023-07-06 Thread Jan Kara
On Wed 05-07-23 14:58:12, Jeff Layton wrote: > Now that everything in-tree is converted to use the accessor functions, > rename the i_ctime field in the inode to discourage direct access. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Looks good. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara

Re: [PATCH v2 92/92] fs: rename i_ctime field to __i_ctime

2023-07-05 Thread Damien Le Moal
On 7/6/23 03:58, Jeff Layton wrote: > Now that everything in-tree is converted to use the accessor functions, > rename the i_ctime field in the inode to discourage direct access. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Looks OK to me. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Rese