Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] powerpc: Removing support for 'protected-sources'

2011-02-04 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 04 February 2011, Meador Inge wrote: > On 02/03/2011 09:56 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > So in 'mpic_init' we don't initialize anything and then in > 'mpic_host_map' we lazily do the VECPRI and CPU binding initialization with: > > if (!(mpic->flags & MPIC_WANTS_RESET)) >

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] powerpc: Removing support for 'protected-sources'

2011-02-03 Thread Meador Inge
On 02/03/2011 09:56 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Thursday 03 February 2011, Meador Inge wrote: In a recent discussion [1, 2] concerning device trees for AMP systems, the question of whether we really need 'protected-sources' arose. The general consensus was that if you don't want a source to be

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] powerpc: Removing support for 'protected-sources'

2011-02-03 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 03 February 2011, Meador Inge wrote: > In a recent discussion [1, 2] concerning device trees for AMP systems, the > question of whether we really need 'protected-sources' arose. The general > consensus was that if you don't want a source to be used, then it should *not* > be mentioned