On Mon, 2024-12-02 at 16:55 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> /* Look for this #address-cells. We have to implement the old linux
> * trick of looking for the parent here as some device-trees rely on
> it
> */
>
> Maybe that's from some system long dropped and we don't need it
On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 4:09 PM Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 08:18:22AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 3:47 PM Segher Boessenkool
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 02:36:32PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > > Michael Ellerman writes:
> >
On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 08:18:22AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 3:47 PM Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 02:36:32PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > Michael Ellerman writes:
> > > > "Rob Herring (Arm)" writes:
> > > >> While OpenFirmware original
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 3:47 PM Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 02:36:32PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Michael Ellerman writes:
> > > "Rob Herring (Arm)" writes:
> > >> While OpenFirmware originally allowed walking parent nodes and default
> > >> root values for #add
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 02:36:32PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Michael Ellerman writes:
> > "Rob Herring (Arm)" writes:
> >> While OpenFirmware originally allowed walking parent nodes and default
> >> root values for #address-cells and #size-cells, FDT has long required
> >> explicit values.
Michael Ellerman writes:
> "Rob Herring (Arm)" writes:
>> While OpenFirmware originally allowed walking parent nodes and default
>> root values for #address-cells and #size-cells, FDT has long required
>> explicit values. It's been a warning in dtc for the root node since the
>> beginning (2005)
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 6:59 AM Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 10:35:58PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > "Rob Herring (Arm)" writes:
> > > While OpenFirmware originally allowed walking parent nodes and default
> > > root values for #address-cells and #size-cells, FDT ha
On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 10:35:58PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> "Rob Herring (Arm)" writes:
> > While OpenFirmware originally allowed walking parent nodes and default
> > root values for #address-cells and #size-cells, FDT has long required
> > explicit values. It's been a warning in dtc for t
Geert Uytterhoeven writes:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 12:37 PM Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> "Rob Herring (Arm)" writes:
>> > While OpenFirmware originally allowed walking parent nodes and default
>> > root values for #address-cells and #size-cells, FDT has long required
>> > explicit values. It's be
On 08/11/2024 14:58, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 8:33 AM Steven Price wrote:
>>
>> On 08/11/2024 14:04, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 7:26 AM Steven Price wrote:
On 08/11/2024 11:04, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 06.11.2024 18:10, R
Hi Rob,
On 08.11.2024 14:25, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 5:04 AM Marek Szyprowski
> wrote:
>> On 06.11.2024 18:10, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
>>> While OpenFirmware originally allowed walking parent nodes and default
>>> root values for #address-cells and #size-cells, FDT has long r
On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 8:33 AM Steven Price wrote:
>
> On 08/11/2024 14:04, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 7:26 AM Steven Price wrote:
> >>
> >> On 08/11/2024 11:04, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> >>> Hi Rob,
> >>>
> >>> On 06.11.2024 18:10, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> While OpenFir
On 08/11/2024 14:04, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 7:26 AM Steven Price wrote:
>>
>> On 08/11/2024 11:04, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> On 06.11.2024 18:10, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
While OpenFirmware originally allowed walking parent nodes and default
root va
On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 7:26 AM Steven Price wrote:
>
> On 08/11/2024 11:04, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > On 06.11.2024 18:10, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> >> While OpenFirmware originally allowed walking parent nodes and default
> >> root values for #address-cells and #size-cells, FDT
On 08/11/2024 11:04, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 06.11.2024 18:10, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
>> While OpenFirmware originally allowed walking parent nodes and default
>> root values for #address-cells and #size-cells, FDT has long required
>> explicit values. It's been a warning in dtc
On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 5:04 AM Marek Szyprowski
wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 06.11.2024 18:10, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> > While OpenFirmware originally allowed walking parent nodes and default
> > root values for #address-cells and #size-cells, FDT has long required
> > explicit values. It's been a
Hi Rob,
On 06.11.2024 18:10, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> While OpenFirmware originally allowed walking parent nodes and default
> root values for #address-cells and #size-cells, FDT has long required
> explicit values. It's been a warning in dtc for the root node since the
> beginning (2005) and fo
On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 12:37 PM Michael Ellerman wrote:
> "Rob Herring (Arm)" writes:
> > While OpenFirmware originally allowed walking parent nodes and default
> > root values for #address-cells and #size-cells, FDT has long required
> > explicit values. It's been a warning in dtc for the root n
"Rob Herring (Arm)" writes:
> While OpenFirmware originally allowed walking parent nodes and default
> root values for #address-cells and #size-cells, FDT has long required
> explicit values. It's been a warning in dtc for the root node since the
> beginning (2005) and for any parent node since 20
19 matches
Mail list logo
