On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 14:51 +1100, Ian Munsie wrote:
> The explanation probably still needs to be expanded more (e.g. this
> could cause a crash for an AFU that supports more than about a thousand
> processes) - see my other email in reply to v1 for more, but I'm happy
> for this to go in as is (bu
The explanation probably still needs to be expanded more (e.g. this
could cause a crash for an AFU that supports more than about a thousand
processes) - see my other email in reply to v1 for more, but I'm happy
for this to go in as is (but ultimately that's mpe's call).
It should also be CCd to st
