* Olof Johansson | 2008-06-25 16:22:50 [-0500]:
>> Kumar / Josh: Should we describe those DT entries in
>> Documentation/powerpc/booting-without-of.txt? In the yes case: which
>> section do you recommend?
>
>I don't see a need to. We don't document the IBM busses there either.
Okey.
>
>
>-Olof
(Taking off the USB cc list)
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 08:24:25PM +0200, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
> Kumar / Josh: Should we describe those DT entries in
> Documentation/powerpc/booting-without-of.txt? In the yes case: which
> section do you recommend?
I don't see a need to. We don't document the I
* Nate Case | 2008-06-17 11:11:38 [-0500]:
>This adds support for hardware configurations that don't match the
>chip default register settings (e.g., 16-bit data bus, DACK and
>DREQ pulled up instead of down, analog overcurrent mode).
>
>These settings are passed in via the OF device tree. The PC
On Jun 17, 2008, at 11:11 AM, Nate Case wrote:
This adds support for hardware configurations that don't match the
chip default register settings (e.g., 16-bit data bus, DACK and
DREQ pulled up instead of down, analog overcurrent mode).
These settings are passed in via the OF device tree. The
