On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 07:59:41PM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> Per Andy (and my limited reading of the UMs), some 83xx have the PMR
> registers and some don't. The compiler either supports the PMR register
> or it doesn't. If you make it runtime configurable, people running CPUs
> that
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Mar 18, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 05:59:03PM -0600, Andy Fleming wrote:
Not all e300 cores support the performance monitors, and the ones
that don't will be confused by the mf/mtpmr instructions. This
allows the support to be optional,
On Mar 18, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 05:59:03PM -0600, Andy Fleming wrote:
Not all e300 cores support the performance monitors, and the ones
that don't will be confused by the mf/mtpmr instructions. This
allows the support to be optional, so the 8349 can tur
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 05:59:03PM -0600, Andy Fleming wrote:
> Not all e300 cores support the performance monitors, and the ones
> that don't will be confused by the mf/mtpmr instructions. This
> allows the support to be optional, so the 8349 can turn it off
> while the 8379 can turn it on. Sadl
On Mar 7, 2008, at 5:59 PM, Andy Fleming wrote:
Not all e300 cores support the performance monitors, and the ones
that don't will be confused by the mf/mtpmr instructions. This
allows the support to be optional, so the 8349 can turn it off
while the 8379 can turn it on. Sadly, those aren't co
Andy Fleming wrote:
> Not all e300 cores support the performance monitors, and the ones
> that don't will be confused by the mf/mtpmr instructions. This
> allows the support to be optional, so the 8349 can turn it off
> while the 8379 can turn it on. Sadly, those aren't config options,
> so it wi
