On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04 2014 at 07:27:06 PM, Dan Streetman wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Ashutosh Dixit
>> wrote:
>>> mic/mpssd along with MIC drivers are currently only usable on
>>> x86_64. So build mic/mpssd only for x86_64 to avoid
On Fri, Dec 05 2014 at 08:18:18 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2014 13:27:29 -0800
> Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
>
>> mic/mpssd along with MIC drivers are currently only usable on
>> x86_64. So build mic/mpssd only for x86_64 to avoid build breaks on
>> big-endian systems.
>
> I can certai
On Fri, Dec 05 2014 at 08:18:18 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2014 13:27:29 -0800
> Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
>
>> mic/mpssd along with MIC drivers are currently only usable on
>> x86_64. So build mic/mpssd only for x86_64 to avoid build breaks on
>> big-endian systems.
>
> I can certai
On Thu, Dec 04 2014 at 07:27:06 PM, Dan Streetman wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Ashutosh Dixit
> wrote:
>> mic/mpssd along with MIC drivers are currently only usable on
>> x86_64. So build mic/mpssd only for x86_64 to avoid build breaks on
>> big-endian systems.
>
> Only building for
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014 13:27:29 -0800
Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
> mic/mpssd along with MIC drivers are currently only usable on
> x86_64. So build mic/mpssd only for x86_64 to avoid build breaks on
> big-endian systems.
I can certainly apply this. But it seems to me that this kind of code
doesn't belo
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
> mic/mpssd along with MIC drivers are currently only usable on
> x86_64. So build mic/mpssd only for x86_64 to avoid build breaks on
> big-endian systems.
Only building for x86_64 is fine, but in that case what's the point of
leaving the htol
