On 03/12/2020 16:27, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
On 12/2/20 8:31 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
Hi Maddy,
I just noticed that I still have "powerpc/perf: Add checks for
reserved values" in my pile (pushed here
https://github.com/aik/linux/commit/61e1bc3f2e19d450e2e2d39174d422160b21957b
)
On 12/2/20 8:31 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
Hi Maddy,
I just noticed that I still have "powerpc/perf: Add checks for
reserved values" in my pile (pushed here
https://github.com/aik/linux/commit/61e1bc3f2e19d450e2e2d39174d422160b21957b
), do we still need it? The lockups I saw were fixed
Hi Maddy,
I just noticed that I still have "powerpc/perf: Add checks for reserved
values" in my pile (pushed here
https://github.com/aik/linux/commit/61e1bc3f2e19d450e2e2d39174d422160b21957b
), do we still need it? The lockups I saw were fixed by
https://github.com/aik/linux/commit/17899eaf88
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:56:12 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> The bhrb_filter_map ("The Branch History Rolling Buffer") callback is
> only defined in raw CPUs' power_pmu structs. The "architected" CPUs use
> generic_compat_pmu which does not have this callback and crashed occur.
>
> This ad
On 6/2/20 8:26 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
The bhrb_filter_map ("The Branch History Rolling Buffer") callback is
only defined in raw CPUs' power_pmu structs. The "architected" CPUs use
generic_compat_pmu which does not have this callback and crashed occur.
This add a NULL pointer chec
