Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi writes:
> Hmm, while reading related code, I noticed that sanitize_check_bounds
> returns 0 in case the type is not map_value or stack.
> It seems like it should be returning an error, cannot check right now
> but I'm pretty sure these are not the two pointer types unprivi
On Thu, 1 May 2025 at 04:17, Luis Gerhorst wrote:
>
> Insert a nospec before the access to prevent it from ever using an index
> that is subject to speculative scalar-confusion.
>
> The access itself can either happen directly in the BPF program (reads
> only, check_stack_read_var_off()) or in a h
On Thu, 1 May 2025 at 10:17, Luis Gerhorst wrote:
>
> Insert a nospec before the access to prevent it from ever using an index
> that is subject to speculative scalar-confusion.
>
> The access itself can either happen directly in the BPF program (reads
> only, check_stack_read_var_off()) or in a h
