Re: [PATCH 207/493] i2c: remove use of __devinit

2012-11-21 Thread Barry Song
2012/11/20 Bill Pemberton : > CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devinit is no longer > needed. > > Signed-off-by: Bill Pemberton > Cc: Jean Delvare > Cc: Wolfram Sang > Cc: "Ben Dooks " > Cc: Rudolf Marek > Cc: Jochen Friedrich > Cc: Peter Korsgaard > Cc: Tony Lindgren > Cc: Ol

Re: [PATCH 207/493] i2c: remove use of __devinit

2012-11-20 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:20:46AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Bill, > > On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:22:36 -0500, Bill Pemberton wrote: > > CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devinit is no longer > > needed. > > Can you please point me/us to the discussion explaining the rationale > be

Re: [PATCH 207/493] i2c: remove use of __devinit

2012-11-20 Thread Jean Delvare
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:23:42 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:20:46AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Hi Bill, > > > > On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:22:36 -0500, Bill Pemberton wrote: > > > CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devinit is no longer > > > needed.

Re: [PATCH 207/493] i2c: remove use of __devinit

2012-11-20 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Bill, On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:22:36 -0500, Bill Pemberton wrote: > CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devinit is no longer > needed. Can you please point me/us to the discussion explaining the rationale behind this move, and the explanation of what will be done exactly? While I can