Le 01/12/2024 à 20:45, Shrikanth Hegde a écrit :
On 11/27/24 12:14, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 25/11/2024 à 05:22, Shrikanth Hegde a écrit :
Once the lazy preemption is supported, it would be desirable to change
the preemption models at runtime. So this change adds support for
dynamic
On 11/27/24 12:14, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 25/11/2024 à 05:22, Shrikanth Hegde a écrit :
Once the lazy preemption is supported, it would be desirable to change
the preemption models at runtime. So this change adds support for dynamic
preemption using DYNAMIC_KEY.
In irq-exit to kernel p
Le 25/11/2024 à 05:22, Shrikanth Hegde a écrit :
Once the lazy preemption is supported, it would be desirable to change
the preemption models at runtime. So this change adds support for dynamic
preemption using DYNAMIC_KEY.
In irq-exit to kernel path, use preempt_model_preemptible for decisio
Le 26/11/2024 à 12:15, Shrikanth Hegde a écrit :
On 11/26/24 16:18, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Hi Christophe, Thanks for taking a look at this.
Le 25/11/2024 à 05:22, Shrikanth Hegde a écrit :
Once the lazy preemption is supported, it would be desirable to change
the preemption models a
On 11/26/24 16:18, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Hi Christophe, Thanks for taking a look at this.
Le 25/11/2024 à 05:22, Shrikanth Hegde a écrit :
Once the lazy preemption is supported, it would be desirable to change
the preemption models at runtime. So this change adds support for dynamic
p
Le 25/11/2024 à 05:22, Shrikanth Hegde a écrit :
Once the lazy preemption is supported, it would be desirable to change
the preemption models at runtime. So this change adds support for dynamic
preemption using DYNAMIC_KEY.
In irq-exit to kernel path, use preempt_model_preemptible for decisio
