On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 08:02 +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
>
> > Ah... crap ! Do you think we should put that in the boot wrapper and
> > fixup the device-tree or should we put it in the PCIe code proper ?
>
> How about this: We change the compatible node to "plb-pciex-440spe"
> (without "A" and "B
On Thursday 06 December 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > +/* Check that the core has been initied and if not, do it */
> > > +static int __init ppc4xx_pciex_check_core_init(struct device_node *np)
> > > +{
> > > + static int core_init;
> > > + int count = -ENODEV;
> > > +
> > > + if (core_
> > +/* Check that the core has been initied and if not, do it */
> > +static int __init ppc4xx_pciex_check_core_init(struct device_node *np)
> > +{
> > + static int core_init;
> > + int count = -ENODEV;
> > +
> > + if (core_init++)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_44x
> >
On Thursday 06 December 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> This adds to the previous 2 patches the support for the 4xx PCI Express
> cells as found in the 440SPe revA, revB and 405EX.
>
> Unfortunately, due to significant differences between these, and other
> interesting "features" of those pie
