On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 11:33:37AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> As far as I remember, Daniel's proposal had some weaknesses that were
> never addressed. At that time I proposed an alternative series that was
> addressing most weaknesses, and my series was considered more mature
> that Daniel
Hi Pratyush,
Le 17/10/2023 à 12:40, Pratyush Brahma a écrit :
> Hi Daniel
>
> We have a usecase which requires this patch necessarily. For android
> usecases, we have two different build variants
> differentiated by defconfigs - production and debug. However, we only
> have a single dts for both
On 17-10-2023 19:51, Daniel Walker (danielwa) wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 04:10:42PM +0530, Pratyush Brahma wrote:
For such a usecase, the CONFIG_CMDLINE_PREPEND seems to be quite useful as
it would help to stitch bootloader
and the desired build variant's configs together. Can you please h
Hi Daniel
We have a usecase which requires this patch necessarily. For android
usecases, we have two different build variants
differentiated by defconfigs - production and debug. However, we only
have a single dts for both these variants.
We want to enable certain features like page owner an
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 04:10:42PM +0530, Pratyush Brahma wrote:
> For such a usecase, the CONFIG_CMDLINE_PREPEND seems to be quite useful as
> it would help to stitch bootloader
> and the desired build variant's configs together. Can you please help to
> merge this patch?
Yes, your at least the s
This seems quite useful. Can you please merge it?
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 06:18:18PM +0200, Tomas Mudrunka wrote:
> This seems quite useful. Can you please merge it?
I need to re-send it before it can be merge. I'll try to update it soon.
Daniel
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 11:32:01 -0800 Daniel Gimpelevich
wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 15:15 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 08:13:08 -0700 Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 08:14:33PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > The patches (or some version of them) a
On Tue, 2021-02-16 at 18:42 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> I'd suggest also to find the good arguments to convince us that this
> series has a real added value, not just "cisco use it in its kernels
> so it is good".
Well, IIRC, this series was endorsed by the device tree maintainers as
the
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 11:32:01AM -0800, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 15:15 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 08:13:08 -0700 Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 08:14:33PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > The patches (or some version of the
Daniel Gimpelevich a écrit :
On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 15:15 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 08:13:08 -0700 Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 08:14:33PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > The patches (or some version of them) are already in linux-next,
> > which messes m
On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 15:15 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 08:13:08 -0700 Daniel Walker wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 08:14:33PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > The patches (or some version of them) are already in linux-next,
> > > which messes me up. I'll disable them f
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 08:13:08 -0700 Daniel Walker wrote:
> > The patches (or some version of them) are already in linux-next,
> > which messes me up. I'll disable them for now.
>
> Those are from my tree, but I remove them when you picked up the series. The
> next linux-next should not have the
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 08:14:33PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 16:23:28 -0700 Daniel Walker wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 03:53:19PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:24:45 -0700 Daniel Walker
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > This code allows archi
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 16:23:28 -0700 Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 03:53:19PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:24:45 -0700 Daniel Walker wrote:
> >
> > > This code allows architectures to use a generic builtin command line.
> >
> > I wasn't cc'ed on [2/4].
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 03:53:19PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:24:45 -0700 Daniel Walker wrote:
>
> > This code allows architectures to use a generic builtin command line.
>
> I wasn't cc'ed on [2/4]. No mailing lists were cc'ed on [0/4] but it
> didn't say anything use
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:24:45 -0700 Daniel Walker wrote:
> This code allows architectures to use a generic builtin command line.
I wasn't cc'ed on [2/4]. No mailing lists were cc'ed on [0/4] but it
didn't say anything useful anyway ;)
I'll queue them up for testing and shall await feedback from
17 matches
Mail list logo
