Re: git apply vs. renamed files index mismatch (was: Re: [PATCH 1/4] POWERPC: Rename dma_64.c to dma.c)

2008-09-08 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 01:27:17AM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > I always thought that posting "-M" patches to the public lists is > discouraged since it is quite difficult to apply them via patch(1). > Also think of non-git users... Yes, it's a horrible idea. __

git apply vs. renamed files index mismatch (was: Re: [PATCH 1/4] POWERPC: Rename dma_64.c to dma.c)

2008-09-08 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 02:18:42PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > Becky Bruce wrote: >> This is in preparation for the merge of the 32 and 64-bit >> dma code in arch/powerpc. >> >> Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> --- >> arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile |2 +- >> arch/powerpc/kernel/d

Re: [PATCH 1/4] POWERPC: Rename dma_64.c to dma.c

2008-09-08 Thread Scott Wood
Becky Bruce wrote: This is in preparation for the merge of the 32 and 64-bit dma code in arch/powerpc. Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile |2 +- arch/powerpc/kernel/dma.c| 200 ++ arch/powerpc/kernel/d