Madhavan Srinivasan writes:
> On Monday 15 October 2018 04:38 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Madhavan Srinivasan writes:
>>
>>> On Saturday 13 October 2018 04:26 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
...
At the moment they're still identical, and we check that at build
time. That's because we hav
On Monday 15 October 2018 04:38 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Madhavan Srinivasan writes:
On Saturday 13 October 2018 04:26 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
We use a shared definition for struct pt_regs in uapi/asm/ptrace.h.
That means the layout of the structure is ABI, ie. we can't change it.
Nicholas Piggin writes:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 21:56:44 +1100
> Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
>> We use a shared definition for struct pt_regs in uapi/asm/ptrace.h.
>> That means the layout of the structure is ABI, ie. we can't change it.
>>
>> That would be fine if it was only used to describe the u
Madhavan Srinivasan writes:
> On Saturday 13 October 2018 04:26 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> We use a shared definition for struct pt_regs in uapi/asm/ptrace.h.
>> That means the layout of the structure is ABI, ie. we can't change it.
>>
>> That would be fine if it was only used to describe the
On Saturday 13 October 2018 04:26 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
We use a shared definition for struct pt_regs in uapi/asm/ptrace.h.
That means the layout of the structure is ABI, ie. we can't change it.
That would be fine if it was only used to describe the user-visible
register state of a proc
On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 21:56:44 +1100
Michael Ellerman wrote:
> We use a shared definition for struct pt_regs in uapi/asm/ptrace.h.
> That means the layout of the structure is ABI, ie. we can't change it.
>
> That would be fine if it was only used to describe the user-visible
> register state of a