Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/strict_rwx: quirks for STRICT_RWX patches

2017-10-15 Thread Balbir Singh
On Wed, 04 Oct 2017 20:04:52 +1100 Michael Ellerman wrote: > Hi Balbir, > > Mainly I think we need to add a check in mark_initmem_nx() too don't we? > Or should we put it somewhere common to both? > > But seeing as I'm replying here are some more comments. > > > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/st

Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/strict_rwx: quirks for STRICT_RWX patches

2017-10-04 Thread Michael Ellerman
Hi Balbir, Mainly I think we need to add a check in mark_initmem_nx() too don't we? Or should we put it somewhere common to both? But seeing as I'm replying here are some more comments. > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/strict_rwx: quirks for STRICT_RWX patches This misses three key things, 1) it'