On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 09:23 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> subtle changes in a "Change rc variable to bool"
> patch should be avoided.
You are right.
If it was a valid change, I should give it a patch for itself.
I will keep that in mind next time.
Thanks for helping!
signature.asc
Descript
On 02.08.19 09:18, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 02.08.19 01:10, Leonardo Bras wrote:
>> Changes the return variable to bool (as the return value) and
>> avoids doing a ternary operation before returning.
>>
>> Also, since rc will always be true, there is no need to do
>> rc &= bool, as (true && X)
On 02.08.19 01:10, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> Changes the return variable to bool (as the return value) and
> avoids doing a ternary operation before returning.
>
> Also, since rc will always be true, there is no need to do
> rc &= bool, as (true && X) will result in X.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Br
