Re: [PATCH 07/17] riscv: vdso: Switch to generic storage implementation

2024-12-18 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024, at 07:30, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 05:35:31PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >> > There is precedence in providing 64bit only vDSO functions, for example >> > __vdso_clock_gettime64() in arm. >> > I do have a small, so far untested, proof-of-concept pa

Re: [PATCH 07/17] riscv: vdso: Switch to generic storage implementation

2024-12-18 Thread Thomas Weißschuh
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 05:35:31PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024, at 16:46, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 03:08:28PM +, Conor Dooley wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 03:10:03PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > >> Might be a clang thing, allmodcon

Re: [PATCH 07/17] riscv: vdso: Switch to generic storage implementation

2024-12-18 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024, at 16:46, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 03:08:28PM +, Conor Dooley wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 03:10:03PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: >> Might be a clang thing, allmodconfig with clang doesn't build either. > > The proposed generic storage inf

Re: [PATCH 07/17] riscv: vdso: Switch to generic storage implementation

2024-12-18 Thread Thomas Weißschuh
Hi Conor, On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 03:08:28PM +, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 03:10:03PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > The generic storage implementation provides the same features as the > > custom one. However it can be shared between architectures, making > > maintenanc

Re: [PATCH 07/17] riscv: vdso: Switch to generic storage implementation

2024-12-18 Thread Conor Dooley
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 03:10:03PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > The generic storage implementation provides the same features as the > custom one. However it can be shared between architectures, making > maintenance easier. > > Co-developed-by: Nam Cao > Signed-off-by: Nam Cao > Signed-off-b