On 6/21/24 11:52, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024, at 11:03, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On Fri, 2024-06-21 at 10:56 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Feel free to pick up the sh patch directly, I'll just merge whatever
is left in the end. I mainly want to ensure we can get all the bug
On 2024-06-21 4:54 a.m., John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2024-06-21 at 08:28 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
It's more likely to be related to the upward growing stack.
I checked the gcc sources and found that out of the 50 supported
architectures, ARGS_GROW_DOWNWARD is set on everythi
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024, at 11:03, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-06-21 at 10:56 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> Feel free to pick up the sh patch directly, I'll just merge whatever
>> is left in the end. I mainly want to ensure we can get all the bugfixes
>> done for v6.10 so I can bu
On Fri, 2024-06-21 at 10:56 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The patches are all independent of one another, except for a couple
> of context changes where multiple patches touch the same lines.
OK.
> Feel free to pick up the sh patch directly, I'll just merge whatever
> is left in the end. I mainly
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024, at 10:52, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Helge and Arnd,
>
> On Thu, 2024-06-20 at 23:21 +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
>> The patch looks good at first sight.
>> I'll pick it up in my parisc git tree and will do some testing the
>> next few days and then push forward for 6
Hi,
On Fri, 2024-06-21 at 08:28 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> It's more likely to be related to the upward growing stack.
> I checked the gcc sources and found that out of the 50 supported
> architectures, ARGS_GROW_DOWNWARD is set on everything except
> for gcn, stormy16 and 32-bit parisc. The o
Hi Helge and Arnd,
On Thu, 2024-06-20 at 23:21 +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> The patch looks good at first sight.
> I'll pick it up in my parisc git tree and will do some testing the
> next few days and then push forward for 6.11 when it opens
Isn't this supposed to go in as one series or can
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024, at 07:26, LEROY Christophe wrote:
> Le 20/06/2024 à 23:21, Helge Deller a écrit :
>> [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de del...@gmx.de. Découvrez
>> pourquoi ceci est important à
>> https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>
>> On 6/20/24 18:23, Arnd Bergmann
Le 20/06/2024 à 23:21, Helge Deller a écrit :
> [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de del...@gmx.de. Découvrez
> pourquoi ceci est important à
> https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> On 6/20/24 18:23, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> From: Arnd Bergmann
>>
>> The sys_fanotify_mark()
On 6/20/24 18:23, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
From: Arnd Bergmann
The sys_fanotify_mark() syscall on parisc uses the reverse word order
for the two halves of the 64-bit argument compared to all syscalls on
all 32-bit architectures. As far as I can tell, the problem is that
the function arguments on pa
10 matches
Mail list logo
