Andrew Donnellan writes:
> On 30/10/20 11:10 pm, Nathan Lynch wrote:
>>> And there's a zero chance that drmgr will ever be fixed on LE?
>>
>> It's always used the sysfs interface on LE, and the only way to provoke
>> it to attempt the syscalls is by doing something like this before
>> running the
On 30/10/20 11:10 pm, Nathan Lynch wrote:
And there's a zero chance that drmgr will ever be fixed on LE?
It's always used the sysfs interface on LE, and the only way to provoke
it to attempt the syscalls is by doing something like this before
running the migration:
# echo 0 > /tmp/fake_api_ver
Andrew Donnellan writes:
> On 30/10/20 12:17 pm, Nathan Lynch wrote:
>> While drmgr has had work in some areas to make its RTAS syscall
>> interactions endian-neutral, its code for performing partition
>> migration via the syscall has never worked on LE. While it is able to
>> complete ibm,suspend
On 30/10/20 12:17 pm, Nathan Lynch wrote:
While drmgr has had work in some areas to make its RTAS syscall
interactions endian-neutral, its code for performing partition
migration via the syscall has never worked on LE. While it is able to
complete ibm,suspend-me successfully, it crashes when atte
