Hi Joakim,
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 12:39:50PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> I figure, after 2.4.37.12, a public git tree on kernel org which still
> receives fixes would be enough.
FYI, I've merged your patches and pushed them along with a few pending
other ones here :
http://git.kernel.or
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 12:39:50PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > BTW, since you're asking, you seem to still be using 2.4. Do you think it's
> > worth pursuing maintenance over 2.4.37.12 and if so for how long ? I'm
> > asking
> > because until the break-in, I felt like almost nobody was usin
Willy Tarreau wrote on 2012/02/08 10:44:26:
>
> Hi Joakim,
>
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 09:44:18AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Willy Tarreau wrote on 2011/12/11 18:33:46:
> > >
> > > Hi Joakim,
> > >
> > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 06:19:54PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > > > To: Joaki
Hi Joakim,
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 09:44:18AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Willy Tarreau wrote on 2011/12/11 18:33:46:
> >
> > Hi Joakim,
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 06:19:54PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > > To: Joakim Tjernlund
> > > > From: Willy Tarreau
> > > >
> > > > Hi Joa
Willy Tarreau wrote on 2011/12/11 18:33:46:
>
> Hi Joakim,
>
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 06:19:54PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > To: Joakim Tjernlund
> > > From: Willy Tarreau
> > >
> > > Hi Joakim, On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:30:06PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund
> > > wrote: > This is a
> > >
Hi Joakim,
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 06:19:54PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > To: Joakim Tjernlund
> > From: Willy Tarreau
> >
> > Hi Joakim, On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:30:06PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund
> > wrote: > This is a
> > backport from 2.6 which I did to overcome 8xx CPU > bugs. 8xx
> To: Joakim Tjernlund
> From: Willy Tarreau
>
> Hi Joakim, On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:30:06PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > This is a
> backport from 2.6 which I did to overcome 8xx CPU > bugs. 8xx does not update
> the DAR register
> when taking a TLB > error caused by dcbX and icbi in
Hi Joakim,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:30:06PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> This is a backport from 2.6 which I did to overcome 8xx CPU
> bugs. 8xx does not update the DAR register when taking a TLB
> error caused by dcbX and icbi insns which makes it very
> tricky to use these insns. Also the
