Re: [PATCH 00/11] Always call constructor for kernel page tables

2025-04-05 Thread Kevin Brodsky
On 17/03/2025 16:30, Ryan Roberts wrote: > On 17/03/2025 14:16, Kevin Brodsky wrote: >> The complications in those special pgtable allocators beg the question: >> does it really make sense to treat efi_mm and init_mm differently in >> e.g. apply_to_pte_range()? Maybe what we really need is a way to

Re: [PATCH 00/11] Always call constructor for kernel page tables

2025-03-17 Thread Ryan Roberts
On 17/03/2025 14:16, Kevin Brodsky wrote: > The complications in those special pgtable allocators beg the question: > does it really make sense to treat efi_mm and init_mm differently in > e.g. apply_to_pte_range()? Maybe what we really need is a way to tell if > an mm corresponds to user memory or