Murilo Opsfelder Araujo writes:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 05:00:21PM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
>> On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 16:27 -0300, Murilo Opsfelder Araujo wrote:
>> > This series was inspired by the need to modernize and display more
>> > informative messages about unhandled signals.
...
>>
> > Should we prefix every line with the PID to avoid this?
>
> That's possible. An alternative would be prefixing each line with the
> process name and its PID, as in the first line. For example:
>
> pandafault[10758]: segfault (11) at 17d0 nip 161c
> lr 7fff
Hi, Mikey.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 05:00:21PM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 16:27 -0300, Murilo Opsfelder Araujo wrote:
> > Hi, everyone.
> >
> > This series was inspired by the need to modernize and display more
> > informative messages about unhandled signals.
> >
> >
On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 16:27 -0300, Murilo Opsfelder Araujo wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
>
> This series was inspired by the need to modernize and display more
> informative messages about unhandled signals.
>
> The "unhandled signal NN" is not very informative. We thought it would
> be helpful adding
