On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 09:50:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 08:25:35 +0530 Anshuman Khandual
> wrote:
>
> > ust wondering which tree-branch this series applies ? Tried all the usual
> > ones but could not apply the series cleanly.
> >
> > v6.16-rc3
> > next-20250624
> > m
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 08:25:35 +0530 Anshuman Khandual
wrote:
> ust wondering which tree-branch this series applies ? Tried all the usual
> ones but could not apply the series cleanly.
>
> v6.16-rc3
> next-20250624
> mm-stable
> mm-unstable
It's now in mm-unstable if that helps.
On 19/06/25 1:12 AM, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> The VMA flags field vma->vm_flags is of type vm_flags_t. Right now this is
> exactly equivalent to unsigned long, but it should not be assumed to be.
>
> Much code that references vma->vm_flags already correctly uses vm_flags_t,
> but a fairly large ch
On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 08:42:51PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> The VMA flags field vma->vm_flags is of type vm_flags_t. Right now this is
> exactly equivalent to unsigned long, but it should not be assumed to be.
>
> Much code that references vma->vm_flags already correctly uses vm_flags_t,
>
