> Thanks. That can't go in until some generic changes have gone in
> first, right? So are you going to push the lot in one go via Andrew,
> or should I wait until the generic part is upstream and then push the
> powerpc bit?
>From what I can see, the related patches are in -mm now, but the power
Roland McGrath writes:
> Indeed so. Here's a replacement patch.
Oh, and could you please also fix the occurrence of
TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK in arch/ppc/kernel/entry.S when this stuff goes
in?
Thanks,
Paul.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs
Roland McGrath writes:
> > This should be _TLF_RESTORE_SIGMASK (leading '_'), I think.
>
> Indeed so. Here's a replacement patch.
Thanks. That can't go in until some generic changes have gone in
first, right? So are you going to push the lot in one go via Andrew,
or should I wait until the ge
> Roland McGrath writes:
>
> > This requires the earlier HAVE_SET_RESTORE_SIGMASK patch series.
> > This does the same for powerpc that I posted the x86 change for.
>
> ...
>
> > +static inline void set_restore_sigmask(void)
> > +{
> > + struct thread_info *ti = current_thread_info();
> > +
Roland McGrath writes:
> This requires the earlier HAVE_SET_RESTORE_SIGMASK patch series.
> This does the same for powerpc that I posted the x86 change for.
...
> +static inline void set_restore_sigmask(void)
> +{
> + struct thread_info *ti = current_thread_info();
> + ti->local_flags |=
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:36:35 -0700 (PDT) Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > This crashes my powerpc mac g5.
>
> It worked fine on mine.
>
> > It happens after the boot, during the first login-over-ssh.
>
> Mine did lots of stuff fine.
>
> > This is with most of the rest of the -mm
> This crashes my powerpc mac g5.
It worked fine on mine.
> It happens after the boot, during the first login-over-ssh.
Mine did lots of stuff fine.
> This is with most of the rest of the -mm poopile applied. i386 and x86_64
> seem OK.
I had only tested with Linus's tree plus the small handfu
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:08:42 -0700 (PDT) Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This requires the earlier HAVE_SET_RESTORE_SIGMASK patch series.
> This does the same for powerpc that I posted the x86 change for.
>
> ---
> Replace TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK with TLF_RESTORE_SIGMASK and define
> our
