On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:20:58PM -0500, Tom Musta wrote:
> > > Isn't that code occasionally used with uprobes too nowadays ?
> >
> > Yes. I believe so.
>
> I'm going to back-pedal a little. I reread code and can connect
> single step code to kprobes but not necessarily to uprobes. So
> I am n
Hi Tom,
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013 07:44:54 -0500 Tom Musta wrote:
>
> > Looks like the patch has been mangled by the mailer ... it's in HTML to
> > begin with :-)
>
> Frustrating. I did use a plain text option on the mail client and did a
> test send to a few accounts before posting to the mailing lis
> > Isn't that code occasionally used with uprobes too nowadays ?
>
> Yes. I believe so.
I'm going to back-pedal a little. I reread code and can connect
single step code to kprobes but not necessarily to uprobes. So
I am not sure that this code is used with uprobes.
> Looks like the patch has been mangled by the mailer ... it's in HTML to
> begin with :-)
Frustrating. I did use a plain text option on the mail client and did a
test send to a few accounts before posting to the mailing list. The
patch was verified by checkpatch.pl before it got mangled.
I w
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 08:35 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>
> Also, you need to indent your code correctly according to
> Documentation/CodingStyle.
Looks like the patch has been mangled by the mailer ... it's in HTML to
begin with :-)
Tom, you need to find a mailer setup that works for sending p
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 08:35 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 10:13:00AM -0500, Tom Musta wrote:
> > To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> > Subject: [PATCH] powerpc: OE=1 Form Instructions Not Decoded Correctly
> > From: Tom Musta
> >
> > PowerISA uses instruction bit 21 to in
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 10:13:00AM -0500, Tom Musta wrote:
> To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Subject: [PATCH] powerpc: OE=1 Form Instructions Not Decoded Correctly
> From: Tom Musta
>
> PowerISA uses instruction bit 21 to indicate that the overflow (OV) bit
> of the XER is to be set, as well
