On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 12:15 -0600, kevin diggs wrote:
> I have a GigE (PowerMac 3,4?) with an upgrade card that has a pair of
> 7455s on it and an 8600 with a 750GX cpu card. I can probably test
> this on the GigE. It is running 2.6.36. Is that recent enough? The
> 8600 is not cooperating.
>
> Th
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> Some of those functions try to adjust the CPU features, for example
> to remove NAP support on some revisions. However, they seem to use
> r5 as an index into the CPU table entry, which might have been right
> a long time ago but no
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 10:48 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
>
> > In absence of good testing I would appreciate a close inspection of the
> > patch
> > by different pairs of eyes :-)
>
> Looks good to me. That broke apparently in 400d221 ("ppc32: make
> cur_cpu_sp
Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
> In absence of good testing I would appreciate a close inspection of the patch
> by different pairs of eyes :-)
Looks good to me. That broke apparently in 400d221 ("ppc32: make
cur_cpu_spec a single pointer instead of an array"), which changed the
calling convent
