On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 17:09 +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_44x
> >> +static void dump_tlb_44x(void);
> >> +#endif
> >
> > No need to #ifdef this...
> >
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_44x
> >> +static void dump_tlb_44x(void)
> >> +{
> >
> > ...or this.
>
> Erm actually, that last one wo
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 16:54 +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_44x
> > +static void dump_tlb_44x(void);
> > +#endif
>
> No need to #ifdef this...
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_44x
> > +static void dump_tlb_44x(void)
> > +{
>
> ...or this.
I don't want to require binutils to understand
> +#ifdef CONFIG_44x
> +static void dump_tlb_44x(void);
> +#endif
No need to #ifdef this...
> +#ifdef CONFIG_44x
> +static void dump_tlb_44x(void)
> +{
...or this.
Segher
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailm
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_44x
>> +static void dump_tlb_44x(void);
>> +#endif
>
> No need to #ifdef this...
>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_44x
>> +static void dump_tlb_44x(void)
>> +{
>
> ...or this.
Erm actually, that last one would give you a compiler warning ("function
defined but not used"), unless you convert th
