On Monday 14 August 2017 09:00 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Dan Carpenter writes:
There is a typo so we call unlock instead of lock.
Fixes: 885dcd709ba9 ("powerpc/perf: Add nest IMC PMU support")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
---
I also don't understand how the &nest_imc_refc[node_id].lock w
On Saturday 12 August 2017 01:35 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
There is a typo so we call unlock instead of lock.
Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan
nest_imc_refc used to maintain list of perf sessions thats using the
nest units currently. This is needed in turning off nest engine microcode
when n
Dan Carpenter writes:
> There is a typo so we call unlock instead of lock.
>
> Fixes: 885dcd709ba9 ("powerpc/perf: Add nest IMC PMU support")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
> ---
> I also don't understand how the &nest_imc_refc[node_id].lock works. Why
> can't we use ref->lock everywhere? They
