Re: [PATCH] powerpc/numa: Associate numa node to its cpu earlier

2022-05-24 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 09:49:34 +0200, Oscar Salvador wrote: > powerpc is the only platform that do not rely on > cpu_up()->try_online_node() to bring up a numa node, > and special cases it, instead, deep in its own machinery: > > dlpar_online_cpu > find_and_online_cpu_nid > try_online_node > > [

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/numa: Associate numa node to its cpu earlier

2022-04-11 Thread Michael Ellerman
Oscar Salvador writes: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 02:28:08PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: >> Given that my patch got accepted into powerpc tree >> https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/e4ff77598a109bd36789ad5e80aba66fc53d0ffb >> is now part of Linus tree, this line may need a slight tweak. > > Right.

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/numa: Associate numa node to its cpu earlier

2022-04-11 Thread Oscar Salvador
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 02:28:08PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > Given that my patch got accepted into powerpc tree > https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/e4ff77598a109bd36789ad5e80aba66fc53d0ffb > is now part of Linus tree, this line may need a slight tweak. Right. @Michael: Will you resolve the

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/numa: Associate numa node to its cpu earlier

2022-04-11 Thread Srikar Dronamraju
* Oscar Salvador [2022-04-11 09:49:34]: > powerpc is the only platform that do not rely on > cpu_up()->try_online_node() to bring up a numa node, > and special cases it, instead, deep in its own machinery: > > dlpar_online_cpu > find_and_online_cpu_nid > try_online_node > > This should not b