On 10/04/17 14:02, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 04/10/2017 07:34 AM, Rashmica Gupta wrote:
Current behaviour assumes that memory in RAM is contiguous and
iterates from the start of RAM to (start + size of memory). When the
memory isn't physically contiguous, this approach doesn't work.
In dis
On 04/10/2017 07:34 AM, Rashmica Gupta wrote:
> Current behaviour assumes that memory in RAM is contiguous and
> iterates from the start of RAM to (start + size of memory). When the
> memory isn't physically contiguous, this approach doesn't work.
In dis contiguous platform, we just finish up walk
