On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 05:04:51PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 08:37:28PM +0100, christophe leroy wrote:
> > Le 22/12/2018 à 18:16, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> > >On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 02:08:02PM +0100, christophe leroy wrote:
> > >>
> > >>Usually, Guarded implie
Le 23/12/2018 à 10:31, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 09:29:44AM +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
• The fetch access is to guarded storage and MSR[IR] = 1.
That is architected, yes. You get an ISI if IR=1 and (N=1 or G=1).
If IR=0, mappings don't apply. So in 4xx/oc
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 09:29:44AM +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> • The fetch access is to guarded storage and MSR[IR] = 1.
That is architected, yes. You get an ISI if IR=1 and (N=1 or G=1).
Segher
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 08:37:28PM +0100, christophe leroy wrote:
> Le 22/12/2018 à 18:16, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> >On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 02:08:02PM +0100, christophe leroy wrote:
> >>
> >>Usually, Guarded implies no exec (at least on 6xx and 8xx).
> >
> >Huh? What do you mean here?
>
>
Le 22/12/2018 à 18:16, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 02:08:02PM +0100, christophe leroy wrote:
Usually, Guarded implies no exec (at least on 6xx and 8xx).
Huh? What do you mean here?
From the 885 Reference Manual:
Address translation: the EA is translated by usi
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 02:08:02PM +0100, christophe leroy wrote:
>
> Usually, Guarded implies no exec (at least on 6xx and 8xx).
Huh? What do you mean here?
Segher
On Saturday, December 22, 2018 2:08:02 PM CET christophe leroy wrote:
>
> Le 22/12/2018 à 12:27, Christian Lamparter a écrit :
> > On Saturday, December 22, 2018 11:59:04 AM CET christophe leroy wrote:
> >>
> >> Le 22/12/2018 à 11:09, Christian Lamparter a écrit :
> >>> This patch fixes a recent r
Le 22/12/2018 à 12:27, Christian Lamparter a écrit :
On Saturday, December 22, 2018 11:59:04 AM CET christophe leroy wrote:
Le 22/12/2018 à 11:09, Christian Lamparter a écrit :
This patch fixes a recent regression in ocm:
ocm.c: In function ‘ocm_init_node’:
ocm.c:182:18: error: invalid ope
On Saturday, December 22, 2018 11:59:04 AM CET christophe leroy wrote:
>
> Le 22/12/2018 à 11:09, Christian Lamparter a écrit :
> > This patch fixes a recent regression in ocm:
> >
> > ocm.c: In function ‘ocm_init_node’:
> > ocm.c:182:18: error: invalid operands to binary |
> > ocm.c:197:17: erro
Le 22/12/2018 à 11:09, Christian Lamparter a écrit :
This patch fixes a recent regression in ocm:
ocm.c: In function ‘ocm_init_node’:
ocm.c:182:18: error: invalid operands to binary |
ocm.c:197:17: error: invalid operands to binary |
Fixes: 56f3c1413f5c ("powerpc/mm: properly set PAGE_KERNEL
10 matches
Mail list logo
