Re: [PATCH] objtool: Make 'sec-address' always on

2023-06-25 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 08:30:48AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote: > >>> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: ibt_selftest+0x14 (.text+0x92b54): sibling > >>> call from callable instruction with modified stack frame > > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .altinstr_replacement+0x19a4: redundant > > UACCESS d

Re: [PATCH] objtool: Make 'sec-address' always on

2023-06-24 Thread Christophe Leroy
Le 22/06/2023 à 08:31, Josh Poimboeuf a écrit : > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 05:20:31PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote: >> Most of the time objtool warnings are useless without the >> absolute address within the section. >> >> Today there is --sec-address option to get it printed, but >> that option

Re: [PATCH] objtool: Make 'sec-address' always on

2023-06-24 Thread Christophe Leroy
Le 24/06/2023 à 09:33, kernel test robot a écrit : > Hi Christophe, > > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: > > [auto build test WARNING on linus/master] > [also build test WARNING on v6.4-rc7 next-20230623] > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a

Re: [PATCH] objtool: Make 'sec-address' always on

2023-06-24 Thread kernel test robot
Hi Christophe, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on linus/master] [also build test WARNING on v6.4-rc7 next-20230623] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as doc

Re: [PATCH] objtool: Make 'sec-address' always on

2023-06-21 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 05:20:31PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote: > Most of the time objtool warnings are useless without the > absolute address within the section. > > Today there is --sec-address option to get it printed, but > that option is nowhere used and requires a change in Makefile > to u