Jean Delvare wrote on 28/09/2009 09:34:34:
>
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:30:32 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Jean Delvare wrote on 28/09/2009 09:28:09:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:26:54 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > > Jean, I just noticed you pull request for i2c on LKML but I did
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:26:54 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Jean, I just noticed you pull request for i2c on LKML but I didn't see this
> patch nor have I got any feedback from you. What is your view?
My view is that i2c-mpc is nor under my jurisdiction, so I did not, and
will not, pay any atten
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:30:32 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote on 28/09/2009 09:28:09:
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:26:54 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > Jean, I just noticed you pull request for i2c on LKML but I didn't see
> > > this
> > > patch nor have I got any feedb
> "Joakim" == Joakim Tjernlund writes:
Hi,
Joakim> Ah, that explains it. Who then will look after i2c-mpc? Kumar?
Ben Dooks (embedded i2c maintainer). He's afaik coming home today, so
give him a few days to catch up on mails.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
__
Jean Delvare wrote on 28/09/2009 09:28:09:
>
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:26:54 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Jean, I just noticed you pull request for i2c on LKML but I didn't see this
> > patch nor have I got any feedback from you. What is your view?
>
> My view is that i2c-mpc is nor under my
Jean, I just noticed you pull request for i2c on LKML but I didn't see this
patch nor have I got any feedback from you. What is your view?
Jocke
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote on 25/09/2009 12:01:17:
>
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > The driver always ends a read with a STOP condition which
> > brea
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> The driver always ends a read with a STOP condition which
> breaks subsequent I2C reads/writes in the same transaction as
> these expect to do a repeated START(ReSTART).
>
> This will also help I2C multimaster as the bus will not be released
> after the first read, but wh
