On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 08:00:21 +0800
kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
Hmm,
I wonder if we can not waste resources if a v2 version of a patch is sent
out. Not sure when this was picked up, but I sent out an updated version
with this f
Hi Steven,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on next-20241004]
[cannot apply to s390/features arm64/for-next/core powerpc/next powerpc/fixes
linus/master v6.12-rc2 v6.12-rc1 v6.11 v6.12-rc2]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop u
Hi Steven,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on next-20241004]
[cannot apply to s390/features arm64/for-next/core powerpc/next powerpc/fixes
linus/master v6.12-rc2 v6.12-rc1 v6.11 v6.12-rc2]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop u
On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:41:40 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/ftrace.h b/include/asm-generic/ftrace.h
> > index 3a23028d69d2..ba7b7d6e55d6 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/ftrace.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/ftrace.h
> > @@ -10,4 +1
Hi Steve,
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/ftrace.h b/include/asm-generic/ftrace.h
> index 3a23028d69d2..ba7b7d6e55d6 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/ftrace.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/ftrace.h
> @@ -10,4 +10,17 @@
> * common definitions are already in linux/ftrace.h.
> */
>
> +#ifnd
On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 08:54:58PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:47:43 -0400
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
> #define arch_ftrace_get_regs(fregs) ({ &arch_ftrace_regs(fregs)->regs; })
>
> I may send a v2 (tomorrow).
Could you also write against which tree this patch is?
It does
On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 08:24:22 +0200
Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >> +
> >> +struct ftrace_regs;
> >> +#define arch_ftrace_regs(fregs) ((struct __arch_ftrace_regs *)(fregs))
> >> +
> >
> > I just realized I can simplify it with:
> >
> > #define arch_ftrace_get_regs(fregs) ({ &arch_ftrace_regs(fregs
On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 16:58:52 +0200
Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 08:54:58PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:47:43 -0400
> > Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > #define arch_ftrace_get_regs(fregs) ({ &arch_ftrace_regs(fregs)->regs; })
> >
> > I may send a v2 (tomorr
On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 08:47:43PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt
>
> ftrace_regs was created to hold registers that store information to save
> function parameters, return value and stack. Since it is a subset of
> pt_regs, it should only be used by its accessor functions. B
Le 08/10/2024 à 02:54, Steven Rostedt a écrit :
On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:47:43 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
+#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
+struct __arch_ftrace_regs {
+ struct pt_regs regs;
+};
+
+#define arch_ftrace_get_regs(fregs)
On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:47:43 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> +#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
> +struct __arch_ftrace_regs {
> + struct pt_regs regs;
> +};
> +
> +#define arch_ftrace_get_regs(fregs) \
> + ({ struct __arch_fregs_regs *__f
11 matches
Mail list logo
