On 11/1/2010 8:35 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 12:54 -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>> The tile architecture uses this framework for our serial console,
>> and our users complain that the delay of up to two seconds feels like
>> the machine has gone non-responsive and is disturb
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 12:54 -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> The tile architecture uses this framework for our serial console,
> and our users complain that the delay of up to two seconds feels like
> the machine has gone non-responsive and is disturbing. By contrast,
> a delay of up to half a second
On 10/27/2010 3:21 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:54:27 -0400 Chris Metcalf wrote:
>> The tile architecture uses this framework for our serial console,
> That may be a mistake unless your console is genuinely only capable of
> polled input.
The console is in fact interrupt-driven wi
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:54:27 -0400
Chris Metcalf wrote:
> The tile architecture uses this framework for our serial console,
That may be a mistake unless your console is genuinely only capable of
polled input.
Alan
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxpp
