On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:07:58AM +0200, Markus Brunner wrote:
> This adds support for a simple ppc405ep board.
> At the moment, there are no 405ep boards in arch/powerpc, so this can be used
> as a template
> for new boards, or migrating them from arch/ppc.
> I2c, UART and EMAC are working. PCI
On Thursday 21 August 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
> I can understand why, as they are really two different platforms. So
> logically it makes sense to have them separate.
Ok, fair enough.
Arnd <><
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.o
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 15:42 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 21 August 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 10:07 +0200, Markus Brunner wrote:
> > > This adds support for a simple ppc405ep board.
> > > At the moment, there are no 405ep boards in arch/powerpc, so this can be
On Thursday 21 August 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 10:07 +0200, Markus Brunner wrote:
> > This adds support for a simple ppc405ep board.
> > At the moment, there are no 405ep boards in arch/powerpc, so this can be
> > used as a template
> > for new boards, or migrating them fro
On 8/21/08, Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I plan on adding more 405 board support very soon. When I do, it'll be
> along the lines of the patch series I just sent out for 44x. There's
> really no reason to have a per CPU/board file if we can avoid it.
>
> Your code is simple enough ove
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 10:07 +0200, Markus Brunner wrote:
> This adds support for a simple ppc405ep board.
> At the moment, there are no 405ep boards in arch/powerpc, so this can be used
> as a template
> for new boards, or migrating them from arch/ppc.
> I2c, UART and EMAC are working. PCI could
Hi Markus,
One small nit:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:07:58 +0200 Markus Brunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +#include
> +#include
> +
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +
> +static int __init ppc405ep_probe(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long root = of_get_flat_dt_ro
