On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 4:51 PM Andrew Jones wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 12:07:51PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> > On 04/01/2024 11:52, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > This applies to linux-next, but I forgot to append -next to the PATCH
> > > prefix.
> >
> >
> > Shoudn't this go to -fixes inst
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 12:07:51PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> On 04/01/2024 11:52, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > This applies to linux-next, but I forgot to append -next to the PATCH
> > prefix.
>
>
> Shoudn't this go to -fixes instead? With a Fixes tag?
I'm not sure how urgent it is since it's a
On 04/01/2024 11:52, Andrew Jones wrote:
This applies to linux-next, but I forgot to append -next to the PATCH
prefix.
Shoudn't this go to -fixes instead? With a Fixes tag?
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 11:43:08AM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
KVM requires EVENTFD, which is selected by HAVE_KVM. O
This applies to linux-next, but I forgot to append -next to the PATCH
prefix.
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 11:43:08AM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> KVM requires EVENTFD, which is selected by HAVE_KVM. Other KVM
> supporting architectures select HAVE_KVM and then their KVM
> Kconfigs ensure its there w
