On 10/8/07, Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 08 October 2007, Grant Likely wrote:
> > Oh, and cell does too. Geoff, does cell support really need to do this:
> > (in cell/setup.c and celleb/setup.c).
> > if (ROOT_DEV == 0) {
> > printk("No ramdisk, default root is /dev/hda2\n");
On Monday 08 October 2007, Grant Likely wrote:
> Oh, and cell does too. Geoff, does cell support really need to do this:
> (in cell/setup.c and celleb/setup.c).
> if (ROOT_DEV == 0) {
> printk("No ramdisk, default root is /dev/hda2\n");
> ROOT_DEV = Root_HDA
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:42:21PM -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 02:41:54PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >
> > On Oct 8, 2007, at 2:03 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> >
> > >>> I can't see a good reason for eval board platform code to mess with
> > >>> the
> > >>> ROOT_DEV value i
On 10/8/07, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/8/07, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Oct 8, 2007, at 10:12 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> >
> > > From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > I can't see a good reason for eval board platform code to mess with
> > > the
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 14:41 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > Powermac and pseries also do this weirdness. Should it be removed
> > from there too?
>
> We need benh to make a comment about powermac.
>
> I think its ok to remove everywhere but we should see if he has any
> issue.
PowerMac has some
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 02:41:54PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Oct 8, 2007, at 2:03 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>
> >>> I can't see a good reason for eval board platform code to mess with
> >>> the
> >>> ROOT_DEV value instead of using the default behaviour (so I'm
> >
> > Powermac and pseries
On Oct 8, 2007, at 2:03 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On 10/8/07, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 8, 2007, at 10:12 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>
>>> From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>> I can't see a good reason for eval board platform code to mess with
>>> the
>>> ROOT_DEV
On 10/8/07, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 8, 2007, at 10:12 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
>
> > From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > I can't see a good reason for eval board platform code to mess with
> > the
> > ROOT_DEV value instead of using the default behaviour (so I'm w
On Oct 8, 2007, at 10:12 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I can't see a good reason for eval board platform code to mess with
> the
> ROOT_DEV value instead of using the default behaviour (so I'm writing
> this patch to see if anyone will clue me in).
>
> Sig
