On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
Victor Gallardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From what I can tell, you don't even need this patch or the defconfig.
> > Nothing differs at this point from Glacier other than the DTS. Since
> > U-Boot is your loader, it should be able to pass the diffe
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Victor Gallardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ppc4xx: Add AMCC Arches 460GT eval board support
>
> Signed-off-by: Victor Gallardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please put a brief description of Arches in the patch description.
Best regards,
Stefan
_
Shouldn't it be enough to have a common compatible value in each
of these boards, e.g. "amcc,generic-ppc44x" and then just ignore the
specific type unless you need to do something special?
This is bad for the same reason that "amcc,44x-" compatible
values
are bad in device nodes. The definitio
And then you don't need this file at all. Just add a
"amcc,canyonlands" string to your root node compatible property.
No! Don't do this because it is not true!
If the board actually _is_ compatible to the canyonlands board (it
only _adds_ stuff, doesn't change things or takes away things), i
Shouldn't it be enough to have a common compatible value in each
of these boards, e.g. "amcc,generic-ppc44x" and then just ignore the
specific type unless you need to do something special?
This is bad for the same reason that "amcc,44x-" compatible
values
are bad in device nodes. The definitio
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 00:58 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Grant Likely wrote:
> >
> > > Shouldn't it be enough to have a common compatible value in each
> > > of these boards, e.g. "amcc,generic-ppc44x" and then just ignore the
> > > specific type unless you need to do s
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Grant Likely wrote:
>
> > Shouldn't it be enough to have a common compatible value in each
> > of these boards, e.g. "amcc,generic-ppc44x" and then just ignore the
> > specific type unless you need to do something special?
>
> This is bad for the same reason that "amcc,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 04:46:01PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Grant Likely wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > And then you don't need this file at all. Just add a
> > > "amcc,canyonlands" string to your root node compatible property.
> >
> > No! Don't do this because it is no
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:37:52AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:15:39 -0600
> Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:50:25AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > And then you don't need this file at all. Just add a
> > > "amcc,canyonlands" string t
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Grant Likely wrote:
>
> >
> > And then you don't need this file at all. Just add a
> > "amcc,canyonlands" string to your root node compatible property.
>
> No! Don't do this because it is not true!
>
> Instead, add your board name to canyonlands.c in canyonlands_pro
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:15:39 -0600
Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:50:25AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:33:26 -0700
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > From: Victor Gallardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > ppc4xx: Add AMCC Arches 460
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:50:25AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:33:26 -0700
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > From: Victor Gallardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > ppc4xx: Add AMCC Arches 460GT eval board support
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Victor Gallardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Fr
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:33:26 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Victor Gallardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ppc4xx: Add AMCC Arches 460GT eval board support
>
> Signed-off-by: Victor Gallardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From what I can tell, you don't even need this patch or the defconfig.
Nothing di
13 matches
Mail list logo
