On May 12, 2009, at 2:06 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
The current device tree for the MPC8272ADS assumes a mapping of 32 MB
of NOR flash at 0xFE00., while there are actually only 8 MB on
the boards, mapped at 0xFF80.. When booting an uImage with such a
device tree, the kernel crashes becaus
Kumar Gala wrote:
Scott, any feedback if our boards have 8M or 32M flash modules?
According to the manual, it comes with 8 but can be expanded to 32. I
don't think we swapped out the flash SIMM that came with the board.
As I wrote earlier in the thread, I don't see any way a current u-boot
On May 13, 2009, at 2:42 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Li Yang,
In message <2a27d3730905130328m27743852w2d68a62ebc32c...@mail.gmail.com
> you wrote:
Although 8MB seems to be the common size used. It can be very easy
changed as a pluggable module. It might be better to make the code
workin
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 07:54:51AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Scott Wood wrote:
> > We should proabbly leave out the ranges altogether, and have u-boot
> > populate it from the mappings it establishes.
>
> No, I vote for manipulating just the entries, which u-boot dynamically
> detect, and let
Hello Scott,
Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 08:27:07AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>> Hello Wolfgang,
>>
>>> The current device tree for the MPC8272ADS assumes a mapping of 32 MB
>>> of NOR flash at 0xFE00., while there are actually only 8 MB on
>>> the boards, mapped at 0xFF80.0
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 08:27:07AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Wolfgang,
>
> > The current device tree for the MPC8272ADS assumes a mapping of 32 MB
> > of NOR flash at 0xFE00., while there are actually only 8 MB on
> > the boards, mapped at 0xFF80.. When booting an uImage with su
Dear Li Yang,
In message <2a27d3730905130328m27743852w2d68a62ebc32c...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> Although 8MB seems to be the common size used. It can be very easy
> changed as a pluggable module. It might be better to make the code
> working for any reasonable flash sizes.
You either hav
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> The current device tree for the MPC8272ADS assumes a mapping of 32 MB
> of NOR flash at 0xFE00., while there are actually only 8 MB on
> the boards, mapped at 0xFF80.. When booting an uImage with such a
> device tree, the kernel crash
Hello Wolfgang,
> The current device tree for the MPC8272ADS assumes a mapping of 32 MB
> of NOR flash at 0xFE00., while there are actually only 8 MB on
> the boards, mapped at 0xFF80.. When booting an uImage with such a
> device tree, the kernel crashes because 0xFE00. is not mapped.
