On Mar 10, 2008, at 7:37 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:55:51AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
Normally we assume kernel images will be loaded at offset 0. However
there are situations, like when the kernel itself is running at a
non-zero
physical address, that we don't want t
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:55:51AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Normally we assume kernel images will be loaded at offset 0. However
> there are situations, like when the kernel itself is running at a non-zero
> physical address, that we don't want to load it at 0.
>
> Allow the wrapper to take an o
On Mar 7, 2008, at 7:44 PM, Geoff Levand wrote:
> On 03/07/2008 08:55 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Normally we assume kernel images will be loaded at offset 0. However
>> there are situations, like when the kernel itself is running at a
>> non-zero
>> physical address, that we don't want to load it
On 03/07/2008 08:55 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Normally we assume kernel images will be loaded at offset 0. However
> there are situations, like when the kernel itself is running at a non-zero
> physical address, that we don't want to load it at 0.
>
> Allow the wrapper to take an offset. We use thi
