Re: [MTD] ofpart: Partitions at same address cannot have the same name

2009-04-29 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 04:19 +0100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > I fail to see the point of this "special" partition in the first > place... > > Things would make more sense if you had a full flash device > whose child nodes are the partitions. That's the model I think I want to move to, and

Re: [MTD] ofpart: Partitions at same address cannot have the same name

2009-04-29 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 10:05 +0200, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > Sometimes, an special partition is included in the device tree including all > the > partitions. Like in: > > partit...@ff00 { > reg = < 0x00 0x80 >; > label = "Root File System"; > }; > partit...@ff80

Re: [MTD] ofpart: Partitions at same address cannot have the same name

2009-04-22 Thread Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
Hello You are right, remove the -1. I thought that strlen gives the #of chars + 1 ('\0'). Thanks On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:24, Peter Korsgaard wrote: >> "Ricardo" == Ricardo Ribalda Delgado writes: > > Hi, > >  Ricardo> Sometimes, an special partition is included in the device >  Ric

Re: [MTD] ofpart: Partitions at same address cannot have the same name

2009-04-22 Thread Peter Korsgaard
> "Ricardo" == Ricardo Ribalda Delgado writes: Hi, Ricardo> Sometimes, an special partition is included in the device Ricardo> tree including all the partitions. Like in: Ricardo> drivers/mtd/ofpart.c |3 ++- Ricardo> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Ricardo> diff